His exact words

Everyone at the company is required to work at least 40 hours per week. The office needs to be where your actual colleagues are located. We will assume you have resigned if you don’t show.

It is interesting that about a month ago, another popular company, Airbnb, announced a fully-remote work globally. Employees can work from home or the office according to Brian Chesky, CEO.

They’re also doing a pay-equalization process across the globe. No matter where you are in the world, you would still be paid per position. That’s fascinating, right?

With two major companies sharing different perspectives and policies, what drives these kinds of decisions, what are the repercussions of such decisions, and which kind of organizations can make related decisions?

There are a few factors that could affect the decision.

1 The kind of industry a company plies might affect decisions around coming to the office, working from home or having a mix of both.

It is likely that organizations in manufacturing, construction and other on-site jobs would embrace a “come to work” not just because their day-to-day operations require physical relations and interactions, but also because their clients, as well as the results of their efforts, have to.

Health insurance, life insurance and other forms of protection were offered by a lot of organizations during COVID, even though they couldn’t take a lot off their field and sites. These kinds of organizations wouldn’t consider remote options because of how intense their work is.

There were 2. Different companies have different functions that ensure jobs get done. From the front desk officer to the IT person, different functions make a difference in the success of the organization. This could involve a reception to work from home for the organization.

If the coin is flipped, an organization where most employees can get their work done with little or nothing physical interaction might be able to afford employees working remotely or sustain a hybrid culture, however, if the coin is flipped, this decision might not be sustainable. The extent to which a hybrid or remote model in a company is permissible depends on the part of the organization’s role and government. Are you able to imagine a fully-remote law firm?

There are 3 Most organizations are technology first when it comes to collaboration and communication in the year 2022. COVID gave companies the opportunity to try out virtual communication and collaboration, even if they were traditional in approach. What direction the companies might decide to move depends on how successful the implementation of the policies is.

A number 4. The kind of work style that is embraced in the organization can be determined by the direction the business is going. The majority of digital-first companies are either hybrid or remote. Global organizations that are embracing globalization might want to embrace a fully remote policy. There is a good example of it.

It is quite paramount that provisions are made for effective collaboration, communication in order to choose a hybrid work pattern.

There have been differing opinions about the future of remote work, the need for physical relationships, and the fact that the future is digital. I don’t think any school of thought is right.

What kind of work is available at your workplace? What are you doing to make work easier? Please share with others.

Tags: hybrid workRemote work